- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:08:06 -0500
- To: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Cc: 'Steven Faulkner' <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "'Gregory J. Rosmaita'" <oedipus@hicom.net>, chris.wilson@microsoft.com, mike@w3.org, alfred.s.gilman@ieee.org, brewer@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 10:05 -0400, Justin James wrote: > > the answer appears in the IRC logs > > > > [18:56] <DanC> MikeSmith, do you know why there are just 5 people in > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/ there were a dozen or so as of > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-issue-tracking/2008Apr/00 > 00.html > > [18:56] <MikeSmith> because of issues 42-50 > > > > source: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20080613#l-359 > > Stephen - > > That does not adequately explain the situation at all. Could someone please > illuminate this group as to what "because of issues 42 - 50" is supposed to > mean? A bunch of issues were added to the tracker which prompted a discussion of whether that was a good use of the tool. While we're sorting this out, Mike reduced the list of people with write access to tracker. Note the discussion continues... # [18:57] <MikeSmith> we can add people back in after we have agreement who should be in there # [18:58] <DanC> in any case, yes, it makes sense to re-sync with people See also the thread on discretion when adding issues in the issue tracking list http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-issue-tracking/2008May/thread.html#msg3 and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-issue-tracking/2008Jun/thread.html#msg3 which is cited from issues 42-50, e.g. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/42 p.s. FYI, I started a discussion a little bit like this back in early April... re-sync on issue tracking http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-issue-tracking/2008Apr/0000.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 16:08:42 UTC