- From: Shawn Medero <shawn@db79.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:18:02 -0700
- To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "James Graham" <jg307@cam.ac.uk>, www-archive@w3.org, "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, "Joshue O Connor" <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote: > Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, 2008-06-05 15:46 +0100: > >> Why can't there be a 'proposal tracker' implemented that is open to >> anyone in the working group to add proposals to, via a form perhaps >> that asks for certain information about the proposal, so it can then >> be evaluated and debated by WG members? > > It might not actually be difficult at all, and I think we already > have what may be an appropriate place/tool for it -- The W3C > public bugzilla: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/ <snip> > > One particular advantage of the bugzilla setup is that it would > allow people (even those that are not HTML WG members or members > of other W3C WGs) to opt-in to particular issues -- and get mail > only about those issues (and not need to try to follow or filter > public-html if they don't want to). Yes, exactly - this is a great idea Mike. It'll help immensely with people who are dealing with the HTML WG largely through sources like public-html-comments, blogs, etc. -s
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2008 16:18:37 UTC