Re: Where is the SVGWG evidence or methodology for the SVG1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 specifications?

Doug,

your response is an assertion of belief, not evidence in a coherent  
argument.

Where is the single document that outlines the case for the SVG  
specifications and provides evidence that the current specifications  
meet the needs outlined?
it appears you cannot point to such a document.

the SVGWG charter appears not to consider end-users** at all, as they  
are not mentioned.
It's hard if not impossible to imagine how the SVGWG deliverables will  
further W3C stated objectives** without some included evidence of  
intention.

regards


Jonathan Chetwynd

j.chetwynd@btinternet.com
http://www.openicon.org/

+44 (0) 20 7978 1764




>> http://www.w3.org/1998/02/Potential.html
>> The first phase of the Web is human communication though shared
>> knowledge.
>


communication is a two way process, which involves everyone in the  
authoring process.

>> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Points/
>> W3C's mission is to lead the Web to its full potential, which it does
>> by developing technologies (specifications, guidelines, software, and
>> tools) that will create a forum for information, commerce,
>> inspiration, independent thought, and collective understanding.
>>
>>
>> Today this universe benefits society by enabling new forms of human
>> communication and opportunities to share knowledge. One of W3C's
>> primary goals is to make these benefits available to all people,
>> whatever their hardware, software, network infrastructure, native
>> language, culture, geographical location, or physical or mental
>> ability.
>

What evidence do you have that the current specifications are helping  
us develop authoring tools for 'all people'.