W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > January 2008

Re: w3photo image-regions vocabulary, w3.org namespace

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:09:43 +0100
Message-ID: <47934817.2070303@w3.org>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: bnowack@semsol.com, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, www-archive@w3.org, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>


Dan Brickley wrote:
> Ivan Herman wrote:
>> [+cc Ralph for the IPR issues...]
> 
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/swap3/swig-charter.html#Ipr
>>
>> gives some guidence, if the goal is to publish this first as an IG 
>> draft and, eventually, as an IG Note (I presume that is what you have 
>> in mind). I presume trying to collect and archive public statements 
>> from the original authors as for their IPR release might be a good 
>> idea; I do not know how realistic that is, though.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Actually the main publication we're talking about, is putting an 
> RDFS/OWL document at a W3C-hosted namespace URI. A Note in /TR/ would be 
> great too of course, ... but the current concern I think is primarily 
> that the schema was never put in place.
> 

Well... we still do not have a real mechanism for defining/storing 
vocabularies in W3C space:-(, but I do not think this could/should be 
done without a proper public review. In which case an IG draft/note is 
only one tiny step...

Ivan

> cheers,
> 
> Dan
> 
>>>> [1] http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2008-01-18.html#T11-16-49
>>>> [2] http://arc.semsol.org/community/irc/logs/2008/01/18#T15:39:32Z
>>>> [3] http://www.bnowack.de/w3photo/pages/image_doc_rdfsowl
>>>> [4] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/image-regions#
>>>> [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Apr/0090.html
>>>> [6] http://www.bnowack.de/w3photo/specs/ontology8
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Sunday, 20 January 2008 13:09:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:12 GMT