Steven Faulkner wrote: > Hi Dan, > > As the PFWG have provided a response to the question of whether alt > should be required or optional in HTML5, what is the process for dealing > with it within the HTML working group? I'm not sure; if you give me a pointer to the PFWG response, that will help me figure it out. This sounds like a design issue; our process around those is not very mature, though you might make sure it's in the list: Product HTML 5 spec Open and Raised Issues http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/products/1 Our priority is on requirements issues so far: Product HTML Principles/Requirements Open and Raised Issues http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/products/2 We actually made a WG decision on one of the requirements issues: ISSUE-15 immediate-mode-graphics requirement for Immediate Mode Graphics and canvas element http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/15 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 17:52:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:10:25 GMT