Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec.

James Graham wrote:
> ...
> Nevertheless, for better or worse the charter puts the burden of proof 
> on those wishing for a formal decision to be made to demonstrate that 
> the decision is needed for progress. Is there a documented reason that 
> this particular decision was so important that it should circumvent the 
> usual proposal-draft-feedback-redraft cycle? We have recently seen the 
> ...

My understanding of that cycle (*) is that it implies that there's no 
way to  get something into the spec the editor doesn't want in there. 
That would be a problem.

BR, Julian

(*) as currently practiced