On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Bonner, Matt wrote: > > Obviously not my decision, by any means. I'm new to the HTMLWG myself. I > can say from what I've observed, that the process steps have been pretty > consistent: > > 1. show web author/reader demand > 2. distill the scenarios into a few key use cases > 3. offer a proposal > 4. respond to feedback & adjust proposal accordingly > 5. if successful, become part of the spec. That's exactly the process we have been trying to follow; I'm glad you have observed us being consistent in this, that's encouraging! The actual steps are listed explicitly in the WHATWG FAQ: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Is_there_a_process_for_adding_new_features_to_the_spec.3F -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 20:48:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 August 2008 20:48:28 GMT