- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:58:36 -0500
- To: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 00:07 +0100, Toby A Inkster wrote: [...] > GRDDL is quite simple and elegant, except for the fact that is > specifies that the data transformations must be written in XSLT, should, actually. [[ Developers of transformations should make available representations in widely-supported formats. XSLT version 1[XSLT1] is the format most widely supported by GRDDL-aware agents as of this writing, though though XSLT2[XSLT2] deployment is increasing. While technically Javascript, C, or virtually any other programming language may be used to express transformations for GRDDL, XSLT is specifically designed to express XML to XML transformations and has some good safety characteristics; XQuery has similar characteristics to XSLT, though use of XQuery in GRDDL implementation is less widely deployed at the time of this writing. ]] -- http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 14:59:01 UTC