W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2008

Re: [html4all] On HTML WG process - was [Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:56:54 -0500
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1208357814.10875.281.camel@pav.lan>

Please let's keep process discussion off public-html...

On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 07:05 -0500, Laura Carlson wrote:
> As an individual, I do think that the HTML5 WG actually seeking advice
> from PFWG, as well as the WAI offering advice on a regular on-going
> basis would be most beneficial to process improvement.

Perhaps you could be more specific about how that would be
different from what is currently happening?

The relevant people seem to be involved in the discussion;
for example, Al Gilman's message of Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:05:41 -0400
makes it clear that he's following much of the discussion.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 14:56:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:19 UTC