Dan Connolly wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 14:57 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: >> Dan Connolly wrote: >>> Any news on this? >> Nope. >> >> Apparently it didn't make it onto Ian's todo list... > > I don't recall Ian being in the critical path. > > I thought you gathered some test results during your > investigation; I just want you to share what you > learned. > > Did I get confused? Partly. I volunteered to run once the known problems with the tests (bad content encoding, maybe more) have been fixed -- running tests that are known to be broken didn't seem to be a good use of my time to me. That being said, I can have another look and see what the current state is; and then potentially ping again Ian. BR, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 13:06:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:10:27 GMT