Hmm, options discussed so far (with arguments judged by me): <img src=001> ++ Authoring. - alt can have been omitted for the wrong reasons currently. - Not compatible with current JAWS - Makes automated conformance checking harder. <img src=001 alt> + Authoring -+ empty string can have been used for the wrong reasons already. -+ What to do when authors omit alt? - Overloads empty string value. - Not compatible with current JAWS <img src=001 alt=magic-string> -+ Somewhat compatible with JAWS (image can be discovered). -+ What to do when authors omit alt? - Overloads alt value with a "random string" - Authoring becomes confusing. <img src=001 alt=content noalt> + Authoring is ok. + Makes automated conformance checking better. -+ alt= can be used to specify a string for older UAs. Not really sure what's better. I'm not sure it matters much either given the current state of ATs and the expected date of arrival of HTML5. I think my money is with the image analyzer tools. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Sunday, 23 September 2007 20:11:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:10:17 GMT