-public-html +www-archive Scott, Robert Burns (3 oct. 2007 - 12:56) : > My point was that nothing in those documents tells us about the big > picture regarding the intent of those major vendors with respect to > XHTML2 or HTML5 (other than that they made intellectual property > available to this WG as do we all). So I would still say that we > members of the HTML WG (humble or otherwise) could not possibly > know the intent of the browser vendors regarding XHTML2 support". > Certainly the citations you provided change nothing about that. Robert is right. These documents say nothing about the intents. And even when a vendor is making a statement, it can change its position later on depending on marketing and market constraints. It has already happened in the past. http://www.bestkungfu.com/archive/date/2004/07/on-implementing-svg/ http://www.xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1865 -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 04:12:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:10:19 GMT