W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2007

Re: any news on your action to "Discuss with PFWG role attribute vs aria attribute"?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:13:55 -0600
To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Cc: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1196374435.7560.433.camel@pav>

On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 12:02 -0500, Michael Cooper wrote:
> I guess the question is whether the action is to initiate the
> discussion, or to bring it to resolution.

The latter, please.

I added a note:

2007-11-29 17:06:06: Michael C, pls update due date with a realistic
timeframe for completing the discussion. [Dan Connolly]

>  I brought it to PFWG. There was some opposition to the idea, but I
> wouldn't say it's been fully ruled out, just not ruled in. There are
> additional discussion planned. So in terms of arriving at a
> resolution, I can't predict that, and if that's what you want to
> track, we should set the due date far in the future.

I changed the due date to 5 December; if you haven't changed
the due date by then, you can expect another ping...

> > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/8


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 22:14:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:11 GMT