Henri Sivonen wrote: > > Hi, > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoehrmann-javascript-scheme-00 says: >> Use of a byte order mark and literal use of the character "/" should >> be avoided. > > > The latter requirement seems impractical. Why is this requirement > present? Could it be relaxed? > > It doesn't seem particularly plausible that javascript: IRI would > participate in a generic IRI/URI operation absolutizing a relative > reference relative to a javascript: IRI. Letting a javascript: URI serve > as the base URI of an HTML document seems non-sensical, for example, > regardless of the presence of slashes. I personally don't see how the use of "javascript:" in HTML href attributes could be made consistent with what the definition of a URI is (yes, I know, Björn disagrees, but then the scheme hasn't been registered yet, right?). So for the work in HTML I think it would be better to use a different term, and to generally discourage their use (Q: can't the same effects be achieved using onClick="..." ?). BR, JulianReceived on Friday, 23 November 2007 12:24:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:11 GMT