- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:43:38 -0500
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 14:57 +0000, Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: [...] Very clever detective work! Fun stuff... I don't have anything to add to the HTML WG discussion, but as I say in my bio... "His research interest is investigating the value of formal descriptions of complex systems like the Web, especially in the consensus-building process." -- http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > This would seem to suggest that rather than being > an unbiased contribution to Wikipedia from a disinterested > party, it is rather more likely to be a statement made by > somebody with a very definite interest in the "ownership" > of the name. On the other hand, lots of people (yourself included) could have changed it and, as far as I know, have not. http://esw.w3.org/topic/WikiConsensus -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 16:43:45 UTC