W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > May 2007

Re: GRDDL - grokCC.xsl

From: Jason Karns <karnsj@cse.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:19:35 -0400
Message-ID: <1005d65f0705211419g29e8d6d4x3ccec6cffad47496@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>

I apologize.  I meant to Reply-All.

>
> Are you interested in coding that up?
>
Yeah, I'd be willing to do that.

> Ben, Harry, do you know of any further work on transformations
> from creative commons HTML markup to RDF?
>
> > 3) Support those who link directly to the RDF version of the license
> > rather than to the HTML version
>
> Hmm... I'm not sure I understand what you mean there. Could you
> elaborate?
>

Currently, you can request a CC license in RDF format by appending
'rdf' to the license url.

For instance:
a) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
b) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/rdf

I currently link directly to the rdf version of the license in my html
documents with rel=license.

I see very few differences between the web.resource.org/cc RDF license
and the http://creativecommons.org/ns# RDF license.

Would it make sense to simply return the RDF version of the CC license
rather than transforming it into the web.resource.org version?

Cheers,
Jason
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 21:58:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:07 GMT