- From: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:52:43 -0500
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Jul 5, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:34:43 +0200, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com> > wrote: >>> So far I haven't seen much activity in the getting user agents >>> more interopable area. Most of it is people requesting a <burger/ >>> > element to be included in the next version of HTML. And >>> complaints about some explicit accessibility features from HTML 4 >>> that are not included in the current draft because several use >>> cases were not considered and not much research was done in the >>> area. >> >> I can't imagine how our WG can't be about interoperability. > > Me neither. > > >> As for <burger/> element, the closest thing we have to a <burger/> >> element are the <video>, <audio>, and <canvas> elements. > > These are not requested, these are being implemented. The > specification is there to make sure they are implemented in an > interoperable way. They help making HTML a more viable open > alternative to Flash, Flex, Silverlight, etc. No... they don't.
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 14:52:50 UTC