W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > July 2007

Re: handling fallback content for still images (www-archive)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:46 +0200
To: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tuzx48ra64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:34:43 +0200, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote:
>> So far I haven't seen much activity in the getting user agents more  
>> interopable area. Most of it is people requesting a <burger/> element  
>> to be included in the next version of HTML. And complaints about some  
>> explicit accessibility features from HTML 4 that are not included in  
>> the current draft because several use cases were not considered and not  
>> much research was done in the area.
>
> I can't imagine how our WG can't be about interoperability.

Me neither.


> As for <burger/> element, the closest thing we have to a <burger/>  
> element are the <video>, <audio>, and <canvas> elements.

These are not requested, these are being implemented. The specification is  
there to make sure they are implemented in an interoperable way. They help  
making HTML a more viable open alternative to Flash, Flex, Silverlight,  
etc.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 14:50:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:07 GMT