- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:46 +0200
- To: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:34:43 +0200, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote: >> So far I haven't seen much activity in the getting user agents more >> interopable area. Most of it is people requesting a <burger/> element >> to be included in the next version of HTML. And complaints about some >> explicit accessibility features from HTML 4 that are not included in >> the current draft because several use cases were not considered and not >> much research was done in the area. > > I can't imagine how our WG can't be about interoperability. Me neither. > As for <burger/> element, the closest thing we have to a <burger/> > element are the <video>, <audio>, and <canvas> elements. These are not requested, these are being implemented. The specification is there to make sure they are implemented in an interoperable way. They help making HTML a more viable open alternative to Flash, Flex, Silverlight, etc. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 14:50:01 UTC