- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 10:23:13 +0900
- To: Preston L.Bannister <preston@bannister.us>
- Cc: "Dean Edridge" <dean@55.co.nz>, public-html@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Just for the record. Le 25 déc. 2007 à 06:44, Preston L. Bannister a écrit : > Things are a little non-obvious. I suspect this has mostly to do > with trying to invent a new process (for W3C) on the fly - nothing > inherently bad. The W3C Process document has *always* evolved with the need of communities. It gives a reasonable stability and at the same time, it is being adjusted when needed. The HTML WG is *right now* operating under the requirements of W3C Process Document. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Tuesday, 25 December 2007 01:23:23 UTC