W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > December 2007

css3-namespace issues

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:13:43 +0100
To: fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.t3t9k5f564w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

Hey,

I think we should resolve the last few issues and go to Last Call early  
January. Some thoughts:

* Remove "For this reason the string syntax is recommended, and the url()  
syntax discouraged deprecated?." as it does not really affect anything.  
The previous sentence already says that URIs are not resolved.

* Remove the reference in the acknowledgments section as it references the  
wrong draft and it does not really matter.

* Make the term "CSS qualified name" instead of just qualified name.

* It's not entirely clear to me what terminology we're using from  
XML-NAMES11. Leaving a reference in to the XML specification is probably  
worthwhile though, although maybe we should pick XML-NAMES instead as  
XML-NAMES11 might be deprecated in due course. (And XML-NAMES is also more  
widely implemented.)

I think I can do the edits to resolve these as suggested if you agree.

Cheers,


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 24 December 2007 12:11:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:12 GMT