- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:55:26 +0000
- To: "John Cowan" <cowan@ccil.org>
- Cc: license-review@opensource.org, www-archive@w3.org
On Dec 19, 2007 5:13 PM, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote: > Here's my suggested revision, which consists of adding the fourth > non-blank line as a patent license and advisory: If sale and use must be mentioned for OSI approval, that's fine. The OSI approved Fair License doesn't mention sale, however, and the FSF's All-Permissive License mentions neither sale nor use. If we're moving away from those inspirations I would moreover prefer: Copyright <Year>, <Entity Name and Optional Metadata> Entities may use, copy, sell, and distribute this work, with or without modification, provided this entire instrument is preserved as a notice. DISCLAIMER: THIS WORK IS WITHOUT WARRANTY. -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:55:35 UTC