W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > December 2007

Re: POWDER: thoughts

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:07:34 +0000
Message-ID: <4762FEA6.1070605@hpl.hp.com>
To: www-archive@w3.org, Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, "Carroll, Jeremy John" <jeremy.carroll@hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>

Still to-do, on Monday

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> - resource descriptions and monotonicity
>   I got a bad non-monotonic feeling while reading the powder-grouping 
> WD; interestingly it was while reading bits that had clearly been 
> written with the issue in mind :(
> 
> - the subclass relationship
>   I take the reified rdfs:subClassOf triple in the example that has 
> circulated in earlier e-mail to be a response to a request to be more 
> formal, or more OWL like, in response to the powder-dr WD. However, the 
> design in the WD looks more user-friendly to me, if it could be made to 
> work ...
> 
Received on Friday, 14 December 2007 22:08:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:12 GMT