- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:41:04 -0500
- To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 10:52 -0700, Chris Wilson wrote: > The tone of conversations on the HTML WG and around the area in general is getting, frankly, > rude (ruder?). I don't think that's productive. I understand your point, and personally > I completely agree with it. The way you raised the issue was directed at Anne, personally > - I think that is a mistake, and raises the level of rudeness rather than lowers it. > This is a problem with a number of people - your example with Anne was actually not a > particularly egregious example. I would have asked you to send a mail to the entire WG > instead that said "I've noticed a number of WG members representing HTML5 as having made > decisions already. I would like to ask that we all not do that. Here are some examples > from various people:... Can we all agree that we must be explicit in saying 'current > thinking/draft' rather than making it sound like decisions have already been made?" > or something like that. Ah... yes, well said; that seems much more likely to move us forward. > Does that accomplish attacking the problem as you see it? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 18:41:21 UTC