W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2007

HTML WG process

From: Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:19:29 -0700
Message-ID: <3b31caf90708150419i7f515461v9df81e6ddb2044b0@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jason White" <jason@jasonjgw.net>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org

Hi Jason,

Several of your recent posts to the WG's mailing list [1] have confused
me. You seem to be objecting to Hixie's editing process.

AFAICT he's editing in exactly the manner he said he would [2], which
was prior to the WG's vote on whether to adopt him (& Hyatt) as editor.
We accepted him as editor with the knowledge of how he would do his job.
Indeed, some may have voted for him precisely because of how he said
he'd work.

Speaking of that vote, I don't see your vote recorded there [3]. Perhaps
you weren't a WG member at the time. It seems like there must be a
better way of raising your process objection, other than re-raising what
seems to me to be a settled matter, whenever Hixie edits something.


1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0507.html
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0500.html
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0460.html
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0454.html
2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007May/0590.html
3. http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/htmlbg/results
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2007 11:19:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:08 GMT