W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2007

Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate (offlist)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:23:44 +1000
To: "Jeff Schiller" <codedread@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.tqyupu0k64w2qv@id-c0020>


On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:20:17 +1000, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>  
wrote:
> Isn't HTML a versioned language?  HTML 3.2 is different than HTML
> 4.01, isn't it?

I think you should read up on what people mean with versioning on this  
list.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 06:24:35 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ian Hickson: "Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate"
Previous message: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: Versioning and html[5] (offlist)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:10:01 GMT