Re: on application/xml and RDF statements vs pictures of statements

On 02/11/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
>
> we figure they're statements. Details attached.



Nov 02 12:20:23 <DanC>    because in some sense, when you fire up an RDF
tool, you the consumer are saying "never mind what the author told the web;
I'm willing to take the risk that he meant RDF"

This seems reasonable to a (distinct) point. Local interpretation of the
material is fine, republication of the material is troublesome. With "never
mind...", any provenance chain is broken.

Cheers,
Danny.



-- 

http://dannyayers.com