W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2006

Re: on application/xml and RDF statements vs pictures of statements

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:09:50 +0100
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd0611021109gc359f8dpfb6b9e870cd9330f@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, "Chimezie Ogbuji" <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>, www-archive@w3.org
On 02/11/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> we figure they're statements. Details attached.

Nov 02 12:20:23 <DanC>    because in some sense, when you fire up an RDF
tool, you the consumer are saying "never mind what the author told the web;
I'm willing to take the risk that he meant RDF"

This seems reasonable to a (distinct) point. Local interpretation of the
material is fine, republication of the material is troublesome. With "never
mind...", any provenance chain is broken.



Received on Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:10:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:03 UTC