Re: [metadataInURI-31] New editors draft for Metadata In URIs Finding

-cc www-tag (prolly editorial, not worth lots of attention),
+cc www-archive (feel free to cite/forward)

On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 18:02 -0400, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
[...]
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/metaDataInURI-31


"A correctly written browser would have shown the faulty XML as text, or
might conceivably have shown a warning about the apparent mismatch
between the type inferred from the URI and the returned Content-Type of
the image."

image? typo? And I don't see any possible mismatch. Copy-and-paste-o?


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Thursday, 11 May 2006 22:18:32 UTC