- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:34:09 +0200
- To: w3t-comm@w3.org
- Cc: "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
According to http://validator.w3.org/checklink the pubrules document http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-pubrules-src.html has quite some broken links (and fragment identifiers). I believe most, if not all, are in the examples. Now pubrules itself is not a document on the TR track, but it would be nice if it sets a good example. It also appears http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules and http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?uimode=filter&uri= don't validate due to namespace declarations that are likely ignored given that the documents have text/html as media type. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 11:34:27 UTC