W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Your blog entry: More W3C Controversy

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:35:09 +0900
Message-Id: <F3AE5DFC-4EB7-431E-A1B7-997CFD666E4C@w3.org>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-archive@w3.org, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
To: Dean Jackson <dino@w3.org>


Le 19 août 06 à 18:03, Dean Jackson a écrit :
> http://dbaron.org/log/2006-08#e20060818a
>
> I just want to say that I really appreciated your article. I agree  
> completely.
>
> Your conclusion that we have to accept "competing" specifications  
> at W3C is something I share, even though I wish it were possible  
> for the W3C to return to being a focused organisation.

+1. It is the first article I have read so far with balanced  
arguments, and sound opinions.

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Sunday, 20 August 2006 23:35:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:00 GMT