W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2006

Re: URIs for W3C Namespaces: editorial

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:18:20 +0200
To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.s8mcouzv64w2qv@id-c0020.lan>

On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:57:06 +0200, Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>> That should probably be "require"...
> Thank you, fixed in line.

There are also several conformance terms not wrapped inside a <span> with  
the appropriate class set. In section 1. you have "... Director MAY  
authorize ..." (two times). Section 2. has "Namespace Documents must  
describe". I believe that's it.

>>  It might make sense to make it more
>> clear that the requirements in the document only apply to namespaces  
>> that
>> have normative meaning in the technical report. Often technical reports
>> use namespaces URIs for examples that are not dereferenceable or have a
>> namespace document.
> Pubrules says:
>  "All proposed XML namespaces created by the publication of the document
> MUST follow URIs for W3C Namespaces."
> So in a sense your request is covered by the encapsulating process.

Fair enough.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 14:18:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:42:57 UTC