- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:18:20 +0200
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:57:06 +0200, Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: >> That should probably be "require"... > > Thank you, fixed in line. There are also several conformance terms not wrapped inside a <span> with the appropriate class set. In section 1. you have "... Director MAY authorize ..." (two times). Section 2. has "Namespace Documents must describe". I believe that's it. >> It might make sense to make it more >> clear that the requirements in the document only apply to namespaces >> that >> have normative meaning in the technical report. Often technical reports >> use namespaces URIs for examples that are not dereferenceable or have a >> namespace document. > > Pubrules says: > > "All proposed XML namespaces created by the publication of the document > MUST follow URIs for W3C Namespaces." > > So in a sense your request is covered by the encapsulating process. Fair enough. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 14:18:30 UTC