Re: Sparql and forms

On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:13 -0400, Mark Baker wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 09:26:45AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > 
> > rdf forms? Sparql forms, where props are mapped to form fields client 
> > side, and the result comes back grddl style
> > 
> > ScheduledTopicChat on rdf forms?
> 
> Count me in!

Heh... funny things happen when one exports ones tooth-brushing
thoughts to www-archive...

>   My schedule's pretty flexible the next couple of weeks.

In the game of teleconference tiddlywinks, he who proposes the meeting
is obliged to propose a specific time:

18:37:11 <DanC> it goes like this: (a) whoever wants the meeting to
happen owes one (or 2 or 3) specific proposals for when to meet, down to
the minute, including duration
http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2005-01-12.html#T18-36-37

One could say that's me.

I have reserved an hour or so starting at 11am Chicago time
this Weds, 5 Oct. That time on Thursday and Friday is free too.

That's a little short notice, but I don't think our goals
include decisions that bind on anyone else, so it should be OK.


> FWIW, my issue with SPARQL is, in essence, that it's not using forms,
> and is instead just a new application protocol (sort of).
> 
> Mark.
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E