- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:05:42 -0500
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, www-archive@w3.org
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:13 -0400, Mark Baker wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 09:26:45AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > rdf forms? Sparql forms, where props are mapped to form fields client > > side, and the result comes back grddl style > > > > ScheduledTopicChat on rdf forms? > > Count me in! Heh... funny things happen when one exports ones tooth-brushing thoughts to www-archive... > My schedule's pretty flexible the next couple of weeks. In the game of teleconference tiddlywinks, he who proposes the meeting is obliged to propose a specific time: 18:37:11 <DanC> it goes like this: (a) whoever wants the meeting to happen owes one (or 2 or 3) specific proposals for when to meet, down to the minute, including duration http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2005-01-12.html#T18-36-37 One could say that's me. I have reserved an hour or so starting at 11am Chicago time this Weds, 5 Oct. That time on Thursday and Friday is free too. That's a little short notice, but I don't think our goals include decisions that bind on anyone else, so it should be OK. > FWIW, my issue with SPARQL is, in essence, that it's not using forms, > and is instead just a new application protocol (sort of). > > Mark. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 3 October 2005 22:05:48 UTC