W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2005

Re: Sparql and forms

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:05:42 -0500
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <1128377142.28805.152.camel@dirk>

On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:13 -0400, Mark Baker wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 09:26:45AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > 
> > rdf forms? Sparql forms, where props are mapped to form fields client 
> > side, and the result comes back grddl style
> > 
> > ScheduledTopicChat on rdf forms?
> Count me in!

Heh... funny things happen when one exports ones tooth-brushing
thoughts to www-archive...

>   My schedule's pretty flexible the next couple of weeks.

In the game of teleconference tiddlywinks, he who proposes the meeting
is obliged to propose a specific time:

18:37:11 <DanC> it goes like this: (a) whoever wants the meeting to
happen owes one (or 2 or 3) specific proposals for when to meet, down to
the minute, including duration

One could say that's me.

I have reserved an hour or so starting at 11am Chicago time
this Weds, 5 Oct. That time on Thursday and Friday is free too.

That's a little short notice, but I don't think our goals
include decisions that bind on anyone else, so it should be OK.

> FWIW, my issue with SPARQL is, in essence, that it's not using forms,
> and is instead just a new application protocol (sort of).
> Mark.
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 3 October 2005 22:05:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:42:54 UTC