On Mar 10, 2005, at 13:48, Patrick Stickler wrote: > ... URIQA since (a) it is not directly relevant > to this discussion Or, more correctly, URIQA is not *central* to this discussion (it is certainly relevant, but can be ignored insofar as the heart of this debate is concerned). PatrickReceived on Monday, 14 March 2005 13:23:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:09:38 GMT