Dave Beckett wrote: >>ps. the dc:relation thing is in there because >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JanMar/0234.html >>via >>http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base tells me that "" >>self-refs aren't >>affected by xml:base. Not sure if that decision got reverted. >> >> >> > >That decision actually shows the opposite and includes an example of >xml:base affecting rdf:about="" in the issue. > > > You're right. I didn't read the whole message properly; apologies! DanReceived on Monday, 18 July 2005 11:47:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:09:40 GMT