W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2004

RE: referendum on httpRange-14

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:49:27 +0300
Message-ID: <1E4A0AC134884349A21955574A90A7A564721B@trebe051.ntc.nokia.com>
To: <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Cc: <sandro@w3.org>, <norman.walsh@sun.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Danny Ayers [mailto:danny.ayers@gmail.com]
> Sent: 20 October, 2004 13:24
> To: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
> Cc: sandro@w3.org; norman.walsh@sun.com; www-archive@w3.org
> Subject: Re: referendum on httpRange-14
> 
> 
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:05:05 +0300, patrick.stickler@nokia.com
> <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> (Jumping in because I have a similar UI requirement)
> 
> > Yes, membership in the class of "web resources" should be 
> determinable
> > based on web behavior, but membership is volitile, and so I would
> > hesitate myself in making any persistent statements about such
> > membership.
> 
> But given that we haven't much in the way of widespread infrastructure
> for handling volatility (the Semantic Web isn't exactly a temporal
> database) I reckon the assumption of persistent "web" class membership
> would be reasonable. 

Perhaps.

> So the appropriate flag would be "web resource"
> (last time I looked).
> 
> Hmm, how about "Represented" as a label?
> 
> > I'd have a default, generic view for "Resources", 
> 
> Or "Things"?

How about Google's "I'm feeling lucky" ;-)

Patrick
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2004 11:49:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:46 GMT