W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2004

Re: Mozilla Intranet focus and quality Assurance.

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:37:47 +0000 (UTC)
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410021621130.21219@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>


https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262166

On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> 
> > Sure, there was lots of mention of intranet- based content using them, 
> > but intranets aren't very high on the list of concerns here
> 
> Are you saying that intranet support is not a primary goal of the 
> Mozilla project, that it only cares about public websites?  Or was it 
> purely on this particular issue that was relevant?

Neither. I was refering to the fact that intranet content does not drive 
feature development in main-line Mozilla products.

See, e.g.:
   http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4096B118.3050903%40meer.net

Brendan's points in that e-mail apply equally well to your patch as they 
did to XForms and MNG when he wrote it.


>>> Am I to assume that an implementation without this problems would be 
>>> perfectly acceptable to Mozilla QA?
>>
>> There's no such entity as "Mozilla QA".
> 
> How is Quality Assurance conducted within in Mozilla?

By anyone who files a bug.


> As I understood http://www.mozilla.org/quality/ to be Mozilla QA.

That is a Web page. Web pages do not have opinions on whether things are 
acceptable or not.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 2 October 2004 16:37:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:46 GMT