- From: Morten Frederiksen <morten@wasab.dk>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:57:16 +0200
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: danbri@w3.org, Matt Biddulph <matt@picdiary.com>, www-archive@w3.org
Hi Jeremy, [This is in reply to a post on swbp-wg, I'm not a member, so...] On Tuesday 30 March 2004 17:35, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > This use of WordNet is fairly naive (in the sense that non-experts can do > it) and does not depend on any of the relationships between words. You are of course right, that the standalone usage that Norm is doing doesn't depend on any relationships, but it is quite possible to do so. Matt Biddulph has been doing this for a while, for his picture annotations (unfortunately the search thingy is down atm, pending a wordnet upgrade): http://www.hackdiary.com/archives/000009.html http://www.hackdiary.com/cats.html#wordnet This approach does use the subclass relationships of the wordnet RDF mapping - it may not be perfect from a linguistic or semantic standpoint, but I think it's a good start. Regards, Morten http://purl.org/net/morten/
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2004 13:20:38 UTC