W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2004

Re: X.509 and PGP

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:07:28 +0200
Message-Id: <7062426E-7D83-11D8-858C-000A95EAFCEA@nokia.com>
Cc: <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "ext Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>


It occurred to me that the CanonicalizationMethod could simply be
TriX serialization + alphanumerical ordering of triples + XML
canonicalization (though I wonder if the latter is going to provide
a true canonicalization...)

An alternative CanonicalizationMethod could simply be N-Triples
with alphanumerical ordering (sans bnode labels) and sequential
bnode labeling after ordering (_:id########)...

Anyway, just thinking out loud (has anyone already solved this?)

Patrick


On Mar 23, 2004, at 12:11, ext Chris Bizer wrote:

>
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> I just had a look at the XML DigSig Spec
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/).
> Interesting document, containing all we need:
>
> 1.  Signature Data Model and Syntax.
> XML-signature data structures must be based on the RDF data model 
> [RDF] but
> need not use the RDF serialization syntax.
>
> 2. Signeture RDF Data Model
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/xmldsig-datamodel-20000112.gif
>
> 3. They definded URI for the relevant signeture and digest methods. 
> e.g.
> http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1 or
> http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1
>
> I didn't find a RDF Schema yet, only a DTD. So when your are done with 
> the
> next version of the vocabulary, it will be easy to replace the 
> relevant swp:
> terms with xml-sig: terms.
>
> Chris
>
>
>

--

Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland
patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2004 06:16:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:09:21 GMT