- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:07:28 +0200
- To: "ext Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>
- Cc: <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
It occurred to me that the CanonicalizationMethod could simply be TriX serialization + alphanumerical ordering of triples + XML canonicalization (though I wonder if the latter is going to provide a true canonicalization...) An alternative CanonicalizationMethod could simply be N-Triples with alphanumerical ordering (sans bnode labels) and sequential bnode labeling after ordering (_:id########)... Anyway, just thinking out loud (has anyone already solved this?) Patrick On Mar 23, 2004, at 12:11, ext Chris Bizer wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, > > I just had a look at the XML DigSig Spec > (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/). > Interesting document, containing all we need: > > 1. Signature Data Model and Syntax. > XML-signature data structures must be based on the RDF data model > [RDF] but > need not use the RDF serialization syntax. > > 2. Signeture RDF Data Model > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/xmldsig-datamodel-20000112.gif > > 3. They definded URI for the relevant signeture and digest methods. > e.g. > http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1 or > http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1 > > I didn't find a RDF Schema yet, only a DTD. So when your are done with > the > next version of the vocabulary, it will be easy to replace the > relevant swp: > terms with xml-sig: terms. > > Chris > > > -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2004 06:16:32 UTC