W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2004

Re: more text

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:58:10 +0200
Message-Id: <F5B023B3-7751-11D8-8C16-000A95EAFCEA@nokia.com>
Cc: <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>
To: "ext Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>


On Mar 16, 2004, at 13:34, ext Chris Bizer wrote:
>
>
> Thus I would also mandate two different namespaces: rdfg: for general 
> terms
> like Graph, subGraphOf, equivialentGraph ... and swp: (short for: 
> Semantic
> Web Publishing) for our agent scenario specific vocabulary.
>

I.e.


    rdfg:Graph
       a rdfs:Class ;
       rdfs:comment "An RDF graph (with intensional semantics)." .

    rdfg:equivalentGraph
       a rdf:Property ;
       rdfs:comment  "The subject and object graphs are equivalent as 
defined by RDF Concepts." ;
       rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ;
       rdfs:range rdfg:Graph .

    rdfg:subGraphOf
       a rdf:Property ;
       rdfs:comment "The subject graph is equivalent to a subset of the 
object graph." ;
       rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ;
       rdfs:range rdfg:Graph ;

And

    swp:Authority
       a rdfs:Class ;
       rdfs:comment "An authority, or origin, of a graph; such as a 
person or company." .

    swp:Signature
       a rdfs:Class ;
       rdfs:comment "A signature used to authenticate a graph." .

    swp:authority
       a rdf:Property ;
       rdfs:comment "The object is the authority, or origin, of the 
subject graph." ;
       rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ;
       rdfs:range swp:Authority .

    swp:assertedBy
       a rdf:Property ;
       rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfg:authority ;
       rdfs:comment "The object is the asserting authority of the 
subject graph." ;
       rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ;
       rdfs:range swp:Authority .

    swp:signature
       a rdf:Property ;
       rdfs:comment "The object is the signature to be used to 
authenticate the subject graph." ;
       rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ;
       rdfs:range swp:Signature .

Seems reasonable to me.

It also further narrows the focus of the 
bootstrapping/grounding/terminal
interpretation to an even more minimal vocabulary.

Patrick

--

Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland
patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 09:17:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:41 GMT