- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:29:39 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, www-archive@w3.org, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
(also de-lurking... www-archive-request, who knew?! 8-) On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 04:08:37PM -0500, Dan Brickley wrote: > Just to de-lurk, yes this all makes sense. One technique that I believe > to be deployable (even if a pragmatic hack) is PGP signing RDF files. > For eg see http://usefulinc.com/foaf/signingFoafFiles > > PGP only assures that the file hasn't been changed since the signer > interacted with it, doesn't assure that the signer asserts it. Right. > My > working guess is that, if the doc itself claims that the signer is its > creator, that is enough to bootstrap the claim that the signer asserts > the triples encoded in the rdf/xml. Potentially tenuous but I can't > think of how else to roll this stuff out... There's always the media type. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JanMar/thread.html#75 Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Friday, 12 March 2004 16:27:36 UTC