W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [w3photo] image regions vocab update

From: Morten Frederiksen <mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:44:43 +0100
To: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com
Message-Id: <04022721444300.01101@zonker.mfd-consult.dk>

On Friday 27 February 2004 13:11, Benjamin Nowack wrote:
> I can see three options then:
> - create width and height with domain=Image
Not an option, methinks, re the confusion issue.

> - re-use width and height from Jim's SVG vocab (domain=Resource)
That could work, but not really desirable.

> - create regionWidth and regionHeight with domain=Region
That could also work, but then 'width' and 'height' would be better (the 
region part is already in the namespace).

> Do we need width and height
> for regions at all (re option 3)? It'd be another "boundingbox in 1D", I
> guess..
That's a very good point. We could very well use that instead, it'd help the 
adoption of boundingBox, and not confuse anyone. However, should someone wish 
to add widht and height properties, it'd be better to have them defined, but 
discouraged, than not at all. I'm not sure what the best approach would be.

> examples would definitely be helpful. my doc-publisher doesn't support them
> yet. I'll try to add the feature at the weekend.
Great.


Regards,
Morten.
=================
This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.

Subscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe

Unsubscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe

Help
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help
Received on Friday, 27 February 2004 15:46:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:39 GMT