W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2004

Re: GRDDL at SWIG? SWBPDWG?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:03:50 -0600
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, www-archive@w3.org, Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1077062630.29429.2031.camel@dirk>

Pretty please?

On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 12:34, Dan Connolly wrote:
> DanBri, Guus,
> 
> I'm getting my head around the TP week...
>   http://www.w3.org/2004/03dc-nce/trip.html
> 
> wondering when/if to present GRDDL at the SWIG meeting
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/meetings/tp2004.html
> and/or the BPDWG meeting. (DanBri, I'll be in touch
> separately about a possible RDF calendar task force
> update.)
> 
> 
> I owe my time to the TAG on Tuesday, so I'd the SWIG
> discussed GRDDL on Monday if at all.
> 
> EricM, thanks for the pointer from
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
> to the SWIG meeting. Now it's easy to find, but the
> BPDWG ftf agenda is still kinda hard to find.
> 
> 
> I still have to go back to Ralph's message of
> 2 Feb to the CG to find it...
>   http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-SWBPD
>   .
> 
> I see RDF-XHTML slated (v 1.6 2004/02/02 20:08:32)
> for Friday morning... hmm... that conflicts with an invitation
> to a Voice WG meeting to talk about TAG stuff.
> 
> Hmm... still no "this is different from the best
> practices meeting" on the SWIG page, danbri...
> nor vice versa, Ralph/Guus.
> 
> So I'm aware of at least one piece of feedback
> pending on each of those FTF meeting pages.
> Please address that issue and as many others
> as you can in the next day or so and let me know.
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you at the W3C Tech Plenary in Cannes 1-5 Mar 2003?
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2004 19:03:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:39 GMT