W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2004

Re: Named graphs next draft

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:28:20 +0300
Message-Id: <EC7FB91A-8DDC-11D8-846D-000A95EAFCEA@nokia.com>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org, ext Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
To: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>


No problem.

Patrick



On Apr 14, 2004, at 09:18, ext Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> Sorry I missed this when submitting the abstract, I suggest we work in 
> any changes into the abstract in the text. I think that the submitted 
> abstract is only used for referee allocation.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> Patrick Stickler wrote:
>
>> Sorry for disappearing over the long weekend (holidays, family, 
>> travel,
>> and all those sorts of distractions... ;-)
>> On Apr 08, 2004, at 16:38, ext Chris Bizer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> The Semantic Web consists of many RDF graphs named by URIs.
>> "named by" -> "nameable by"
>> I.e. the SW also includes alot of unnamed graphs...
>>> This
>>> paper extends the syntax and semantics of RDF to cover such
>>> collections of Named Graphs.
>> "to cover such collections of Named Graphs" -> "to cover such Named 
>> Graphs"
>> I think the term 'collections' may be too loaded. Better to state
>> it more generally.
>>> This enables RDF statements that
>>> describe graphs, which is beneficial in many Semantic Web
>>> application areas. As a case study, we explore the application
>>> area of Semantic Web publishing: Named Graphs allow publishers to
>>> communicate assertional intent, and to sign their graphs;
>>> information consumers can evaluate specific graphs using
>>> task-specific trust policies, and act on information from those
>>> named graphs that they accept. Graphs are trusted depending on:
>>> their content; information about the graph; and the task the user
>>> is performing. The extension of RDF to Named Graphs provides a
>>> formally defined framework which could be used as a foundation for
>>> the Semantic Web trust layer.
>> I like the rest.
>>>
>>> Is the last sentence to ambitious?
>> It doesn't seem so to me.
>>> We could also write:
>>>
>>> This provides a foundation for information consumers to subjectively
>>> evaluate the trustworthiness of information found on the Semantic 
>>> Web using
>>> a formally defined framework.
>> I like the first version above better.
>> Patrick
>>>
>>> I will include some other changes, that I have discussed with 
>>> Jeremy, and
>>> send an updated version of the paper tonight.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
>>> To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
>>> Cc: "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>; "Patrick Stickler"
>>> <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; <www-archive@w3.org>; "ext Chris Bizer"
>>> <chris@bizer.de>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 3:35 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Named graphs next draft
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Locks etc.
>>>>
>>>> Chris currently has the latex sources with lock.
>>>> Later today, he should send these sources to Pat and the archive 
>>>> and Pat
>>>> can either change the latex sources or write plain text (like last 
>>>> time).
>>>>
>>>> Chris would like the lock on Tuesday UK time, I would like the lock 
>>>> on
>>>> Wednesday.
>>>>
>>>> Pat could have the lock from this evening through to Monday night.
>>>>
>>>> Hope this works,
>>>>
>>>> Chris and Pat can probably sort things.
>>>>
>>>> Please make sure there is an agreed abstract on the archive soon, 
>>>> since I
>>>> will submit it Monday.
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -- 
>> Patrick Stickler
>> Nokia, Finland
>> patrick.stickler@nokia.com
>
>

--

Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland
patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 02:28:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:42 GMT