Re: Named graphs next draft

Sorry I missed this when submitting the abstract, I suggest we work in any 
changes into the abstract in the text. I think that the submitted abstract 
is only used for referee allocation.

Jeremy



Patrick Stickler wrote:

> 
> Sorry for disappearing over the long weekend (holidays, family, travel,
> and all those sorts of distractions... ;-)
> 
> 
> On Apr 08, 2004, at 16:38, ext Chris Bizer wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> The Semantic Web consists of many RDF graphs named by URIs.
> 
> 
> "named by" -> "nameable by"
> 
> I.e. the SW also includes alot of unnamed graphs...
> 
>> This
>> paper extends the syntax and semantics of RDF to cover such
>> collections of Named Graphs.
> 
> 
> "to cover such collections of Named Graphs" -> "to cover such Named Graphs"
> 
> I think the term 'collections' may be too loaded. Better to state
> it more generally.
> 
>> This enables RDF statements that
>> describe graphs, which is beneficial in many Semantic Web
>> application areas. As a case study, we explore the application
>> area of Semantic Web publishing: Named Graphs allow publishers to
>> communicate assertional intent, and to sign their graphs;
>> information consumers can evaluate specific graphs using
>> task-specific trust policies, and act on information from those
>> named graphs that they accept. Graphs are trusted depending on:
>> their content; information about the graph; and the task the user
>> is performing. The extension of RDF to Named Graphs provides a
>> formally defined framework which could be used as a foundation for
>> the Semantic Web trust layer.
> 
> 
> I like the rest.
> 
>>
>> Is the last sentence to ambitious?
> 
> 
> It doesn't seem so to me.
> 
>> We could also write:
>>
>> This provides a foundation for information consumers to subjectively
>> evaluate the trustworthiness of information found on the Semantic Web 
>> using
>> a formally defined framework.
> 
> 
> I like the first version above better.
> 
> 
> Patrick
> 
> 
>>
>> I will include some other changes, that I have discussed with Jeremy, and
>> send an updated version of the paper tonight.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
>> To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
>> Cc: "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>; "Patrick Stickler"
>> <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; <www-archive@w3.org>; "ext Chris Bizer"
>> <chris@bizer.de>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 3:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: Named graphs next draft
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Locks etc.
>>>
>>> Chris currently has the latex sources with lock.
>>> Later today, he should send these sources to Pat and the archive and Pat
>>> can either change the latex sources or write plain text (like last 
>>> time).
>>>
>>> Chris would like the lock on Tuesday UK time, I would like the lock on
>>> Wednesday.
>>>
>>> Pat could have the lock from this evening through to Monday night.
>>>
>>> Hope this works,
>>>
>>> Chris and Pat can probably sort things.
>>>
>>> Please make sure there is an agreed abstract on the archive soon, 
>>> since I
>>> will submit it Monday.
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> -- 
> 
> Patrick Stickler
> Nokia, Finland
> patrick.stickler@nokia.com
>

Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 02:18:38 UTC