W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2004

Re: TriQL examples and EBNF

From: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 10:10:57 +0200
Message-ID: <001b01c41bae$b417bad0$1f12fea9@named4gc1asnuj>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>, <www-archive@w3.org>
Hi Patrick,

thanks for the comments. RDQL and TriQL support typed literals. I have
changed the examples accordingly.

Chris


----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
To: "ext Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>
Cc: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>; "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: TriQL examples and EBNF


>
> Looks good. Only a few comments:
>
> 1. "?warrent" -> "?warrant"
>
> 2. In your examples, you probably should use typed literals for the
> date values, e.g. "2003-10-02"^^xsd:date rather than "2/10/2003" if
> you expect date comparisons to have any meaning in terms of dates
> rather than strings.
>
> Granted, RDQL doesn't support typed literals (or does it?). In any
> case, I'd add support for typed literals to make value comparisons
> meaningful.
>
> That's it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
> On Apr 05, 2004, at 20:08, ext Chris Bizer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > if have written down some TriQL example queries and extended Andy's
> > RDQL
> > EBNF for TriQL. See attached document.
> >
> > All comments are welcome. I would be especially interested in Patrick's
> > opinion, being the specialist for query languages.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > <TriQL.htm>
>
> --
>
> Patrick Stickler
> Nokia, Finland
> patrick.stickler@nokia.com
>
>
>



Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 05:21:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:42 GMT