W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2003

Re: URI references and links

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:44:18 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20031115094257.00bc9f88@127.0.0.1>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>

Tim said something very like this a while ago.  I thought the distinction 
drawn between identifier and reference was helpful.

#g
--

At 14:42 15/11/03 +0900, Dan Connolly wrote:

>"A link is built from two pieces:
>   a base URI
>   a URI reference"
>  -- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/webarch-20031111/#links
>
>I think URI references are an irrelevant detail
>when discussing links.
>
>URI references are shorthand for URIs in general,
>not just in links.
>
>And the fact that URIs have a shorthand form isn't
>very interesting when discussing links.
>
>Sorry I don't have a replacement to suggest just now,
>I'm writing from the meeting.
>
>
>--
>Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Saturday, 15 November 2003 04:46:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:09:12 GMT