- From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:23:30 -0800
- To: "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <roberto.chinnici@sun.com>, <sanjiva@us.ibm.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>
> > 4. Some assertions are captured in the schema. For example the fact > > that wsdl:import and wsdl:include must appear before wsdl:types > > This is also in the text, is it not? In fact, the text is far clearer > on the subject of required sequence, I believe. Surely the (normative) Schema is clearer on issues like ordering than the text. One could even claim that the text would be redundant with the Schema and therefore not needed. (I'm mostly serious.)
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2003 15:23:41 UTC