W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2003

RE: Review of QA Spec guidelines

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 05:09:13 -0800
Message-ID: <92456F6B84D1324C943905BEEAE0278E0490335D@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, <roberto.chinnici@sun.com>, <sanjiva@us.ibm.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>

 Amy,

If you have feedback on the spec guidelines that would be great.

Thanks

Gudge

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amelia A. Lewis [mailto:alewis@tibco.com] 
> Sent: 13 March 2003 16:32
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: moreau@crf.canon.fr; Jeffrey Schlimmer; 
> roberto.chinnici@sun.com; sanjiva@us.ibm.com; www-archive@w3.org
> 
> I've already looked into the ops and spec guidelines, and can 
> offer feedback on either, if needed (I looked into these as 
> part of transitioning external-to-w3c spec development to 
> more formal guidelines).
> 
> Amy!
> 
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:25:45 -0800
> "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> > Editors,
> > 
> > We are tasked with reviewing the documents at[1,2]. We need to have 
> > this done by next Tuesday so that we can discuss the 
> comments on the 
> > Thursday call next week. I'm looking for people to leap up and say 
> > 'me, me, I can do that!' ;-)
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > Gudge
> > 
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/qaframe-spec-checklist.html
> 
> 
> --
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 08:09:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:28 GMT