Amy, If you have feedback on the spec guidelines that would be great. Thanks Gudge > > -----Original Message----- > From: Amelia A. Lewis [mailto:alewis@tibco.com] > Sent: 13 March 2003 16:32 > To: Martin Gudgin > Cc: moreau@crf.canon.fr; Jeffrey Schlimmer; > roberto.chinnici@sun.com; sanjiva@us.ibm.com; www-archive@w3.org > > I've already looked into the ops and spec guidelines, and can > offer feedback on either, if needed (I looked into these as > part of transitioning external-to-w3c spec development to > more formal guidelines). > > Amy! > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:25:45 -0800 > "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > Editors, > > > > We are tasked with reviewing the documents at[1,2]. We need to have > > this done by next Tuesday so that we can discuss the > comments on the > > Thursday call next week. I'm looking for people to leap up and say > > 'me, me, I can do that!' ;-) > > > > Cheers > > > > Gudge > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/qaframe-spec-checklist.html > > > -- > Amelia A. Lewis > Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. > alewis@tibco.com > >Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 08:09:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:08:55 GMT