- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:34:48 +0300
- To: herman.ter.horst@philips.com
- Cc: pfps@research.bell-labs.com, www-archive@w3.org
Hi Herman this is a personal msg, and not on behalf of RDF Core. I would find it helpful to understand your opinion and/or Peter's concerning an informal discussion between some members of RDF core concerning how to fix the bug you detected. This is minuted in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0154 Summary: ** The current design has extensional definitions of subClassOf and subPropertyOf. ... This could be changed to intensional definitions ... transitivity and reflexivity can be achieved by fiat: ... permit semantic extensions to add back in the extensional reading of subClassOf and subPropertyOf. ** I cc this message to www-archive, feel free to copy any response to any appropriate mailing list. thanks Jeremy
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 05:35:19 UTC