Re: Test cases doc - any comments before exposing to WG

> I have finished the first cut at the updates agreed at f2f.
>
> The document can be found at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot.html
>
> I am going to:
> - print it off and look at it
> - run it through the various W3C checkers
>
>
> make some last updates and then circulate it to the WG for review.
>
> This would be a good time to make any comments.
>
> I suggest looking at
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot.html#conformance


I think that in 4.1.1 one link (OWL Lite..graph form) should point to
..#OWL_DL_Lite_graphs instead of ..#OWL_Lite_RDF_graphs


I guess that [RFC 2119] should point to the References which could say

  [RFC 2119] Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
   -- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt


I think you have made a good wording with
"MAY return Unknown..in the case where a resource limit has been exceeded."
(good idea as well btw ;-))


> and
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot.html#changes


fine

maybe I've made some cases Full whereas they could have been Lite or DL
(wasn't always sure...)

I think this can move forward (I've also done testing and remain with 7
NP+)


-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/