Re: Site metadata; my preference

[moved to www-archive because I'm sick of www-tag]

> And why, instead of adding a new HTTP method or header, why not simply use
> content-negotiation? the meta-info will have its own ETag (provided ETages
> are consistent in the server), its own URI. Even if it is automatically
> generated (see XMP extraction of a JPEG or whatever format).

How would that work?   "Accept: application/meta-html" or something?

     - sandro